“Our team-including ethicists and technologists-has reviewed Blake’s concerns per our A.I. After suspending Lemoine last summer, Google accused him of “anthropomorphizing today’s conversational models, which are not sentient.” experts, of course, disagree with his take on the technology, including ones still working for his former employer. But when they use those terms, there’s also an understanding of the responsibilities that the owner has to the dog.”įiguring out some kind of comparable relationship between humans and A.I., he said, “is the best way forward for us, understanding that we are dealing with intelligent artifacts.” “People don’t think they own their dogs in the same sense that they own their car, though there is an ownership relationship, and people do talk about it in those terms. “We’re going to have to create a new space in our world for these new kinds of entities, and the metaphor that I think is the best fit is dogs,” he said. Surprisingly, he brought our furry canine companions into the conversation, noting that our symbiotic relationship with dogs has evolved over the course of thousands of years. In an interview with Lemoine published on Friday, Futurism asked him about his “best-case hope” for A.I. ethicist at Google, the software engineer made headlines last summer by claiming one of the tech giant’s advanced A.I. Blake Lemoine has thoughts on how that might best play out.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |